In The Literature
Bustamante R, González-Pérez E, Caro-Vadillo A, Aguado D. Impact of preanaesthetic electrocardiogram on decision making and modification of anaesthetic protocols in dogs. Vet Rec. 2024;195(5):e4266. doi:10.1002/vetr.4266
The Research …
The impact of routine preanesthetic testing on anesthetic drug choice for patients with unremarkable history and physical examination findings is unclear. In one study, only 0.2% of dogs required protocol modifications due to an abnormal laboratory test result.1
The goal of this study was to evaluate whether a preanesthetic ECG in clinically healthy dogs would prompt changes to a standard anesthetic protocol (ie, premedication with methadone and an alpha-2 receptor agonist and induction with propofol) or inotropic support or would result in delay or cancellation of the procedure. A 6-lead ECG was used. Abnormal findings included ventricular premature complexes, P wave disturbances, and impulse conduction issues; sinus arrhythmia was not considered an alteration.
Of 228 dogs, 72 (31.6%) had an abnormal ECG. The most prevalent abnormalities were T wave amplitude (31.9%) and ST segment (23.6%) alterations. Echocardiogram was recommended for 5 dogs; 1 dog did not undergo echocardiogram because the owner declined, and the remaining 4 dogs had echocardiogram abnormalities. The anesthetic plan was modified due to ECG changes in 11 dogs (4.8% of all dogs; 15.3% of dogs with ECG alterations).
… The Takeaways
Key pearls to put into practice:
Although ≈5% of dogs in this study required protocol modifications based on ECG findings, this number may have been significantly smaller if an alpha-2 receptor agonist was not administered as premedication, as this drug class greatly impacts the cardiovascular system.
Routine preanesthetic ECG in young, clinically healthy dogs may be ideal but is unlikely to yield a significant abnormality and is currently not encouraged; however, older dogs and breeds predisposed to arrhythmias (eg, Doberman pinschers, boxers, German shepherd dogs) would more likely benefit from preanesthetic ECG.2
Based on the most common ECG abnormalities noted in this study, preanesthetic ECGs would likely need to be interpreted by a cardiologist, which may not be practical in daily practice. Nevertheless, ECG monitoring during induction is recommended to facilitate early detection of abnormalities (eg, severe bradycardia) and prompt treatment.
You are reading 2-Minute Takeaways, a research summary resource proudly presented by Clinician’s Brief. Clinician’s Brief does not conduct primary research.